xref: /openwifi/doc/app_notes/inject_80211.md (revision ea75aaf6b2ecefe9439bfa45a5ed76771d9ed492)
1a6085186SLina Ceballos<!--
2*ea75aaf6SJiao XianjunAuthor: Michael Mehari
3*ea75aaf6SJiao XianjunSPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2019 UGent
4a6085186SLina CeballosSPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-later
5a6085186SLina Ceballos-->
67273ec43Smmehari
77273ec43Smmehari## 802.11 packet injection
87273ec43Smmehari
97273ec43SmmehariThe Linux wireless networking stack (i.e. driver, mac80211, cfg80211, net_dev, user app) is a robust implementation supporting a plethora of wireless devices. As robust as it is, it also has a drawback when it comes to single-layer testing.
107273ec43Smmehari
117273ec43SmmehariPing and Iperf are well established performance measurement tools. However, using such tools to measure 802.11 PHY performance can be misleading, simply because they touch multiple layers in the network stack.
127273ec43Smmehari
137273ec43SmmehariLuckily, the mac80211 Linux subsystem provides packet injection functionality and it allows us to have finer control over physical layer testing.
147273ec43Smmehari
157273ec43SmmehariTo this end, we have adapted a [packetspammer](https://github.com/gnychis/packetspammer) application originally written by Andy Green <[email protected]> and maintained by George Nychis <[email protected]>.
167273ec43Smmehari
177273ec43Smmehari### inject_80211
187273ec43SmmehariUserspace program to inject 802.11 packets through mac80211 supported (softmac) wireless devices.
197273ec43Smmehari
207273ec43Smmehari### Options
217273ec43Smmehari  ```
227273ec43Smmehari-m/--hw_mode <hardware operation mode> (a,g,n)
237273ec43Smmehari-r/--rate_index <rate/MCS index> (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
247273ec43Smmehari-i/--sgi_flag (0,1)
257273ec43Smmehari-n/--num_packets <number of packets>
267273ec43Smmehari-s/--payload_size <payload size in bytes>
277273ec43Smmehari-d/--delay <delay between packets in usec>
287273ec43Smmehari-h   this menu
297273ec43Smmehari  ```
307273ec43Smmehari
317273ec43Smmehari### Example:
327273ec43Smmehari```
337273ec43Smmehariiw dev wlan0 interface add mon0 type monitor && ifconfig mon0 up
347273ec43Smmehariinject_80211 -m n -r 0  -n 64 -s 100 mon0     # Inject 10 802.11n packets at 6.5Mbps bitrate and 64bytes size
357273ec43Smmehari```
367273ec43Smmehari
377273ec43Smmehari### Link performance test
387273ec43Smmehari
397273ec43SmmehariTo make a profound experimental analysis on the physical layer performance, we can rely on automation scripts.
407273ec43Smmehari
417273ec43SmmehariThe following script will inject 100 802.11n packets at different bitrates and payload sizes.
427273ec43Smmehari
437273ec43Smmehari```
447273ec43Smmehari#!/bin/bash
457273ec43Smmehari
467273ec43SmmehariHW_MODE='n'
477273ec43SmmehariCOUNT=100
487273ec43SmmehariDELAY=1000
497273ec43SmmehariRATE=( 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 )
507273ec43SmmehariSIZE=( $(seq -s' ' 50 100 1450) ) # paload size in bytes
517273ec43SmmehariIF="mon0"
527273ec43Smmehari
537273ec43Smmeharifor (( i = 0 ; i < ${#PAYLOAD[@]} ; i++ )) do
547273ec43Smmehari	for (( j = 0 ; j < ${#RATE[@]} ; j++ )) do
557273ec43Smmehari		inject_80211 -m $HW_MODE -n $COUNT -d $DELAY -r ${RATE[$j]} -s ${SIZE[$i]} $IF
567273ec43Smmehari		sleep 1
577273ec43Smmehari	done
587273ec43Smmeharidone
597273ec43Smmehari
607273ec43Smmehari```
617273ec43Smmehari
627273ec43SmmehariOn the receiver side, we can use tcpdump to collect the pcap traces.
637273ec43Smmehari
647273ec43Smmehari```
657273ec43Smmehariiw dev wlan0 interface add mon0 type monitor && ifconfig mon0 up
667273ec43Smmeharitcpdump -i mon0 -w trace.pcap 'wlan addr1 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff and wlan addr2 66:55:44:33:22:11'
677273ec43Smmehari```
687273ec43Smmehari
697273ec43SmmehariWlan addresses *ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff* and *66:55:44:33:22:11* are specific to our injector application.
707273ec43Smmehari
717273ec43SmmehariNext, we analyze the collected pcap traces using the analysis tool provided.
727273ec43Smmehari
737273ec43Smmehari```
747273ec43Smmeharianalyze_80211 trace.pcap
757273ec43Smmehari```
767273ec43Smmehari
777273ec43SmmehariAn excerpt from a sample analysis looks the following
787273ec43Smmehari
797273ec43Smmehari```
807273ec43SmmehariHW MODE	RATE(Mbps)	SGI	SIZE(bytes)	COUNT	Duration(sec)
817273ec43Smmehari=======	==========	===	===========	=====	=============
827273ec43Smmehari802.11n	6.5           	OFF	54		100	0.11159
837273ec43Smmehari802.11n	13.0		OFF	54		100	0.11264
847273ec43Smmehari802.11n	19.5		OFF	54		100	0.11156
857273ec43Smmehari802.11n	26.0		OFF	54	    	100	0.11268
867273ec43Smmehari802.11n	39.0		OFF	54	    	100	0.11333
877273ec43Smmehari802.11n	52.0		OFF	54	    	100	0.11149
887273ec43Smmehari802.11n	58.5		OFF	54	    	100	0.11469
897273ec43Smmehari802.11n	65.0		OFF	54	    	100	0.11408
907273ec43Smmehari```
917273ec43Smmehari
92