1*10465441SEvalZero 2*10465441SEvalZero Frequently Asked Questions about zlib 3*10465441SEvalZero 4*10465441SEvalZero 5*10465441SEvalZeroIf your question is not there, please check the zlib home page 6*10465441SEvalZerohttp://www.zlib.org which may have more recent information. 7*10465441SEvalZeroThe lastest zlib FAQ is at http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_faq.html 8*10465441SEvalZero 9*10465441SEvalZero 10*10465441SEvalZero 1. Is zlib Y2K-compliant? 11*10465441SEvalZero 12*10465441SEvalZero Yes. zlib doesn't handle dates. 13*10465441SEvalZero 14*10465441SEvalZero 2. Where can I get a Windows DLL version? 15*10465441SEvalZero 16*10465441SEvalZero The zlib sources can be compiled without change to produce a DLL. 17*10465441SEvalZero See the file win32/DLL_FAQ.txt in the zlib distribution. 18*10465441SEvalZero Pointers to the precompiled DLL are found in the zlib web site at 19*10465441SEvalZero http://www.zlib.org. 20*10465441SEvalZero 21*10465441SEvalZero 3. Where can I get a Visual Basic interface to zlib? 22*10465441SEvalZero 23*10465441SEvalZero See 24*10465441SEvalZero * http://www.dogma.net/markn/articles/zlibtool/zlibtool.htm 25*10465441SEvalZero * contrib/visual-basic.txt in the zlib distribution 26*10465441SEvalZero * win32/DLL_FAQ.txt in the zlib distribution 27*10465441SEvalZero 28*10465441SEvalZero 4. compress() returns Z_BUF_ERROR. 29*10465441SEvalZero 30*10465441SEvalZero Make sure that before the call of compress, the length of the compressed 31*10465441SEvalZero buffer is equal to the total size of the compressed buffer and not 32*10465441SEvalZero zero. For Visual Basic, check that this parameter is passed by reference 33*10465441SEvalZero ("as any"), not by value ("as long"). 34*10465441SEvalZero 35*10465441SEvalZero 5. deflate() or inflate() returns Z_BUF_ERROR. 36*10465441SEvalZero 37*10465441SEvalZero Before making the call, make sure that avail_in and avail_out are not 38*10465441SEvalZero zero. When setting the parameter flush equal to Z_FINISH, also make sure 39*10465441SEvalZero that avail_out is big enough to allow processing all pending input. 40*10465441SEvalZero Note that a Z_BUF_ERROR is not fatal--another call to deflate() or 41*10465441SEvalZero inflate() can be made with more input or output space. A Z_BUF_ERROR 42*10465441SEvalZero may in fact be unavoidable depending on how the functions are used, since 43*10465441SEvalZero it is not possible to tell whether or not there is more output pending 44*10465441SEvalZero when strm.avail_out returns with zero. 45*10465441SEvalZero 46*10465441SEvalZero 6. Where's the zlib documentation (man pages, etc.)? 47*10465441SEvalZero 48*10465441SEvalZero It's in zlib.h for the moment, and Francis S. Lin has converted it to a 49*10465441SEvalZero web page zlib.html. Volunteers to transform this to Unix-style man pages, 50*10465441SEvalZero please contact us ([email protected]). Examples of zlib usage are in the files 51*10465441SEvalZero example.c and minigzip.c. 52*10465441SEvalZero 53*10465441SEvalZero 7. Why don't you use GNU autoconf or libtool or ...? 54*10465441SEvalZero 55*10465441SEvalZero Because we would like to keep zlib as a very small and simple 56*10465441SEvalZero package. zlib is rather portable and doesn't need much configuration. 57*10465441SEvalZero 58*10465441SEvalZero 8. I found a bug in zlib. 59*10465441SEvalZero 60*10465441SEvalZero Most of the time, such problems are due to an incorrect usage of 61*10465441SEvalZero zlib. Please try to reproduce the problem with a small program and send 62*10465441SEvalZero the corresponding source to us at [email protected] . Do not send 63*10465441SEvalZero multi-megabyte data files without prior agreement. 64*10465441SEvalZero 65*10465441SEvalZero 9. Why do I get "undefined reference to gzputc"? 66*10465441SEvalZero 67*10465441SEvalZero If "make test" produces something like 68*10465441SEvalZero 69*10465441SEvalZero example.o(.text+0x154): undefined reference to `gzputc' 70*10465441SEvalZero 71*10465441SEvalZero check that you don't have old files libz.* in /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib or 72*10465441SEvalZero /usr/X11R6/lib. Remove any old versions, then do "make install". 73*10465441SEvalZero 74*10465441SEvalZero10. I need a Delphi interface to zlib. 75*10465441SEvalZero 76*10465441SEvalZero See the contrib/delphi directory in the zlib distribution. 77*10465441SEvalZero 78*10465441SEvalZero11. Can zlib handle .zip archives? 79*10465441SEvalZero 80*10465441SEvalZero Not by itself, no. See the directory contrib/minizip in the zlib 81*10465441SEvalZero distribution. 82*10465441SEvalZero 83*10465441SEvalZero12. Can zlib handle .Z files? 84*10465441SEvalZero 85*10465441SEvalZero No, sorry. You have to spawn an uncompress or gunzip subprocess, or adapt 86*10465441SEvalZero the code of uncompress on your own. 87*10465441SEvalZero 88*10465441SEvalZero13. How can I make a Unix shared library? 89*10465441SEvalZero 90*10465441SEvalZero make clean 91*10465441SEvalZero ./configure -s 92*10465441SEvalZero make 93*10465441SEvalZero 94*10465441SEvalZero14. How do I install a shared zlib library on Unix? 95*10465441SEvalZero 96*10465441SEvalZero After the above, then: 97*10465441SEvalZero 98*10465441SEvalZero make install 99*10465441SEvalZero 100*10465441SEvalZero However, many flavors of Unix come with a shared zlib already installed. 101*10465441SEvalZero Before going to the trouble of compiling a shared version of zlib and 102*10465441SEvalZero trying to install it, you may want to check if it's already there! If you 103*10465441SEvalZero can #include <zlib.h>, it's there. The -lz option will probably link to it. 104*10465441SEvalZero 105*10465441SEvalZero15. I have a question about OttoPDF. 106*10465441SEvalZero 107*10465441SEvalZero We are not the authors of OttoPDF. The real author is on the OttoPDF web 108*10465441SEvalZero site: Joel Hainley, [email protected]. 109*10465441SEvalZero 110*10465441SEvalZero16. Can zlib decode Flate data in an Adobe PDF file? 111*10465441SEvalZero 112*10465441SEvalZero Yes. See http://www.fastio.com/ (ClibPDF), or http://www.pdflib.com/ . 113*10465441SEvalZero To modify PDF forms, see http://sourceforge.net/projects/acroformtool/ . 114*10465441SEvalZero 115*10465441SEvalZero17. Why am I getting this "register_frame_info not found" error on Solaris? 116*10465441SEvalZero 117*10465441SEvalZero After installing zlib 1.1.4 on Solaris 2.6, running applications using zlib 118*10465441SEvalZero generates an error such as: 119*10465441SEvalZero 120*10465441SEvalZero ld.so.1: rpm: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/local/lib/libz.so: 121*10465441SEvalZero symbol __register_frame_info: referenced symbol not found 122*10465441SEvalZero 123*10465441SEvalZero The symbol __register_frame_info is not part of zlib, it is generated by 124*10465441SEvalZero the C compiler (cc or gcc). You must recompile applications using zlib 125*10465441SEvalZero which have this problem. This problem is specific to Solaris. See 126*10465441SEvalZero http://www.sunfreeware.com for Solaris versions of zlib and applications 127*10465441SEvalZero using zlib. 128*10465441SEvalZero 129*10465441SEvalZero18. Why does gzip give an error on a file I make with compress/deflate? 130*10465441SEvalZero 131*10465441SEvalZero The compress and deflate functions produce data in the zlib format, which 132*10465441SEvalZero is different and incompatible with the gzip format. The gz* functions in 133*10465441SEvalZero zlib on the other hand use the gzip format. Both the zlib and gzip 134*10465441SEvalZero formats use the same compressed data format internally, but have different 135*10465441SEvalZero headers and trailers around the compressed data. 136*10465441SEvalZero 137*10465441SEvalZero19. Ok, so why are there two different formats? 138*10465441SEvalZero 139*10465441SEvalZero The gzip format was designed to retain the directory information about 140*10465441SEvalZero a single file, such as the name and last modification date. The zlib 141*10465441SEvalZero format on the other hand was designed for in-memory and communication 142*10465441SEvalZero channel applications, and has a much more compact header and trailer and 143*10465441SEvalZero uses a faster integrity check than gzip. 144*10465441SEvalZero 145*10465441SEvalZero20. Well that's nice, but how do I make a gzip file in memory? 146*10465441SEvalZero 147*10465441SEvalZero You can request that deflate write the gzip format instead of the zlib 148*10465441SEvalZero format using deflateInit2(). You can also request that inflate decode 149*10465441SEvalZero the gzip format using inflateInit2(). Read zlib.h for more details. 150*10465441SEvalZero 151*10465441SEvalZero21. Is zlib thread-safe? 152*10465441SEvalZero 153*10465441SEvalZero Yes. However any library routines that zlib uses and any application- 154*10465441SEvalZero provided memory allocation routines must also be thread-safe. zlib's gz* 155*10465441SEvalZero functions use stdio library routines, and most of zlib's functions use the 156*10465441SEvalZero library memory allocation routines by default. zlib's Init functions allow 157*10465441SEvalZero for the application to provide custom memory allocation routines. 158*10465441SEvalZero 159*10465441SEvalZero Of course, you should only operate on any given zlib or gzip stream from a 160*10465441SEvalZero single thread at a time. 161*10465441SEvalZero 162*10465441SEvalZero22. Can I use zlib in my commercial application? 163*10465441SEvalZero 164*10465441SEvalZero Yes. Please read the license in zlib.h. 165*10465441SEvalZero 166*10465441SEvalZero23. Is zlib under the GNU license? 167*10465441SEvalZero 168*10465441SEvalZero No. Please read the license in zlib.h. 169*10465441SEvalZero 170*10465441SEvalZero24. The license says that altered source versions must be "plainly marked". So 171*10465441SEvalZero what exactly do I need to do to meet that requirement? 172*10465441SEvalZero 173*10465441SEvalZero You need to change the ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM #defines in zlib.h. In 174*10465441SEvalZero particular, the final version number needs to be changed to "f", and an 175*10465441SEvalZero identification string should be appended to ZLIB_VERSION. Version numbers 176*10465441SEvalZero x.x.x.f are reserved for modifications to zlib by others than the zlib 177*10465441SEvalZero maintainers. For example, if the version of the base zlib you are altering 178*10465441SEvalZero is "1.2.3.4", then in zlib.h you should change ZLIB_VERNUM to 0x123f, and 179*10465441SEvalZero ZLIB_VERSION to something like "1.2.3.f-zachary-mods-v3". You can also 180*10465441SEvalZero update the version strings in deflate.c and inftrees.c. 181*10465441SEvalZero 182*10465441SEvalZero For altered source distributions, you should also note the origin and 183*10465441SEvalZero nature of the changes in zlib.h, as well as in ChangeLog and README, along 184*10465441SEvalZero with the dates of the alterations. The origin should include at least your 185*10465441SEvalZero name (or your company's name), and an email address to contact for help or 186*10465441SEvalZero issues with the library. 187*10465441SEvalZero 188*10465441SEvalZero Note that distributing a compiled zlib library along with zlib.h and 189*10465441SEvalZero zconf.h is also a source distribution, and so you should change 190*10465441SEvalZero ZLIB_VERSION and ZLIB_VERNUM and note the origin and nature of the changes 191*10465441SEvalZero in zlib.h as you would for a full source distribution. 192*10465441SEvalZero 193*10465441SEvalZero25. Will zlib work on a big-endian or little-endian architecture, and can I 194*10465441SEvalZero exchange compressed data between them? 195*10465441SEvalZero 196*10465441SEvalZero Yes and yes. 197*10465441SEvalZero 198*10465441SEvalZero26. Will zlib work on a 64-bit machine? 199*10465441SEvalZero 200*10465441SEvalZero It should. It has been tested on 64-bit machines, and has no dependence 201*10465441SEvalZero on any data types being limited to 32-bits in length. If you have any 202*10465441SEvalZero difficulties, please provide a complete problem report to [email protected] 203*10465441SEvalZero 204*10465441SEvalZero27. Will zlib decompress data from the PKWare Data Compression Library? 205*10465441SEvalZero 206*10465441SEvalZero No. The PKWare DCL uses a completely different compressed data format 207*10465441SEvalZero than does PKZIP and zlib. However, you can look in zlib's contrib/blast 208*10465441SEvalZero directory for a possible solution to your problem. 209*10465441SEvalZero 210*10465441SEvalZero28. Can I access data randomly in a compressed stream? 211*10465441SEvalZero 212*10465441SEvalZero No, not without some preparation. If when compressing you periodically 213*10465441SEvalZero use Z_FULL_FLUSH, carefully write all the pending data at those points, 214*10465441SEvalZero and keep an index of those locations, then you can start decompression 215*10465441SEvalZero at those points. You have to be careful to not use Z_FULL_FLUSH too 216*10465441SEvalZero often, since it can significantly degrade compression. 217*10465441SEvalZero 218*10465441SEvalZero29. Does zlib work on MVS, OS/390, CICS, etc.? 219*10465441SEvalZero 220*10465441SEvalZero We don't know for sure. We have heard occasional reports of success on 221*10465441SEvalZero these systems. If you do use it on one of these, please provide us with 222*10465441SEvalZero a report, instructions, and patches that we can reference when we get 223*10465441SEvalZero these questions. Thanks. 224*10465441SEvalZero 225*10465441SEvalZero30. Is there some simpler, easier to read version of inflate I can look at 226*10465441SEvalZero to understand the deflate format? 227*10465441SEvalZero 228*10465441SEvalZero First off, you should read RFC 1951. Second, yes. Look in zlib's 229*10465441SEvalZero contrib/puff directory. 230*10465441SEvalZero 231*10465441SEvalZero31. Does zlib infringe on any patents? 232*10465441SEvalZero 233*10465441SEvalZero As far as we know, no. In fact, that was originally the whole point behind 234*10465441SEvalZero zlib. Look here for some more information: 235*10465441SEvalZero 236*10465441SEvalZero http://www.gzip.org/#faq11 237*10465441SEvalZero 238*10465441SEvalZero32. Can zlib work with greater than 4 GB of data? 239*10465441SEvalZero 240*10465441SEvalZero Yes. inflate() and deflate() will process any amount of data correctly. 241*10465441SEvalZero Each call of inflate() or deflate() is limited to input and output chunks 242*10465441SEvalZero of the maximum value that can be stored in the compiler's "unsigned int" 243*10465441SEvalZero type, but there is no limit to the number of chunks. Note however that the 244*10465441SEvalZero strm.total_in and strm_total_out counters may be limited to 4 GB. These 245*10465441SEvalZero counters are provided as a convenience and are not used internally by 246*10465441SEvalZero inflate() or deflate(). The application can easily set up its own counters 247*10465441SEvalZero updated after each call of inflate() or deflate() to count beyond 4 GB. 248*10465441SEvalZero compress() and uncompress() may be limited to 4 GB, since they operate in a 249*10465441SEvalZero single call. gzseek() and gztell() may be limited to 4 GB depending on how 250*10465441SEvalZero zlib is compiled. See the zlibCompileFlags() function in zlib.h. 251*10465441SEvalZero 252*10465441SEvalZero The word "may" appears several times above since there is a 4 GB limit 253*10465441SEvalZero only if the compiler's "long" type is 32 bits. If the compiler's "long" 254*10465441SEvalZero type is 64 bits, then the limit is 16 exabytes. 255*10465441SEvalZero 256*10465441SEvalZero33. Does zlib have any security vulnerabilities? 257*10465441SEvalZero 258*10465441SEvalZero The only one that we are aware of is potentially in gzprintf(). If zlib 259*10465441SEvalZero is compiled to use sprintf() or vsprintf(), then there is no protection 260*10465441SEvalZero against a buffer overflow of a 4K string space, other than the caller of 261*10465441SEvalZero gzprintf() assuring that the output will not exceed 4K. On the other 262*10465441SEvalZero hand, if zlib is compiled to use snprintf() or vsnprintf(), which should 263*10465441SEvalZero normally be the case, then there is no vulnerability. The ./configure 264*10465441SEvalZero script will display warnings if an insecure variation of sprintf() will 265*10465441SEvalZero be used by gzprintf(). Also the zlibCompileFlags() function will return 266*10465441SEvalZero information on what variant of sprintf() is used by gzprintf(). 267*10465441SEvalZero 268*10465441SEvalZero If you don't have snprintf() or vsnprintf() and would like one, you can 269*10465441SEvalZero find a portable implementation here: 270*10465441SEvalZero 271*10465441SEvalZero http://www.ijs.si/software/snprintf/ 272*10465441SEvalZero 273*10465441SEvalZero Note that you should be using the most recent version of zlib. Versions 274*10465441SEvalZero 1.1.3 and before were subject to a double-free vulnerability. 275*10465441SEvalZero 276*10465441SEvalZero34. Is there a Java version of zlib? 277*10465441SEvalZero 278*10465441SEvalZero Probably what you want is to use zlib in Java. zlib is already included 279*10465441SEvalZero as part of the Java SDK in the java.util.zip package. If you really want 280*10465441SEvalZero a version of zlib written in the Java language, look on the zlib home 281*10465441SEvalZero page for links: http://www.zlib.org/ 282*10465441SEvalZero 283*10465441SEvalZero35. I get this or that compiler or source-code scanner warning when I crank it 284*10465441SEvalZero up to maximally-pedantic. Can't you guys write proper code? 285*10465441SEvalZero 286*10465441SEvalZero Many years ago, we gave up attempting to avoid warnings on every compiler 287*10465441SEvalZero in the universe. It just got to be a waste of time, and some compilers 288*10465441SEvalZero were downright silly. So now, we simply make sure that the code always 289*10465441SEvalZero works. 290*10465441SEvalZero 291*10465441SEvalZero36. Valgrind (or some similar memory access checker) says that deflate is 292*10465441SEvalZero performing a conditional jump that depends on an uninitialized value. 293*10465441SEvalZero Isn't that a bug? 294*10465441SEvalZero 295*10465441SEvalZero No. That is intentional for performance reasons, and the output of 296*10465441SEvalZero deflate is not affected. This only started showing up recently since 297*10465441SEvalZero zlib 1.2.x uses malloc() by default for allocations, whereas earlier 298*10465441SEvalZero versions used calloc(), which zeros out the allocated memory. 299*10465441SEvalZero 300*10465441SEvalZero37. Will zlib read the (insert any ancient or arcane format here) compressed 301*10465441SEvalZero data format? 302*10465441SEvalZero 303*10465441SEvalZero Probably not. Look in the comp.compression FAQ for pointers to various 304*10465441SEvalZero formats and associated software. 305*10465441SEvalZero 306*10465441SEvalZero38. How can I encrypt/decrypt zip files with zlib? 307*10465441SEvalZero 308*10465441SEvalZero zlib doesn't support encryption. The original PKZIP encryption is very weak 309*10465441SEvalZero and can be broken with freely available programs. To get strong encryption, 310*10465441SEvalZero use GnuPG, http://www.gnupg.org/ , which already includes zlib compression. 311*10465441SEvalZero For PKZIP compatible "encryption", look at http://www.info-zip.org/ 312*10465441SEvalZero 313*10465441SEvalZero39. What's the difference between the "gzip" and "deflate" HTTP 1.1 encodings? 314*10465441SEvalZero 315*10465441SEvalZero "gzip" is the gzip format, and "deflate" is the zlib format. They should 316*10465441SEvalZero probably have called the second one "zlib" instead to avoid confusion 317*10465441SEvalZero with the raw deflate compressed data format. While the HTTP 1.1 RFC 2616 318*10465441SEvalZero correctly points to the zlib specification in RFC 1950 for the "deflate" 319*10465441SEvalZero transfer encoding, there have been reports of servers and browsers that 320*10465441SEvalZero incorrectly produce or expect raw deflate data per the deflate 321*10465441SEvalZero specficiation in RFC 1951, most notably Microsoft. So even though the 322*10465441SEvalZero "deflate" transfer encoding using the zlib format would be the more 323*10465441SEvalZero efficient approach (and in fact exactly what the zlib format was designed 324*10465441SEvalZero for), using the "gzip" transfer encoding is probably more reliable due to 325*10465441SEvalZero an unfortunate choice of name on the part of the HTTP 1.1 authors. 326*10465441SEvalZero 327*10465441SEvalZero Bottom line: use the gzip format for HTTP 1.1 encoding. 328*10465441SEvalZero 329*10465441SEvalZero40. Does zlib support the new "Deflate64" format introduced by PKWare? 330*10465441SEvalZero 331*10465441SEvalZero No. PKWare has apparently decided to keep that format proprietary, since 332*10465441SEvalZero they have not documented it as they have previous compression formats. 333*10465441SEvalZero In any case, the compression improvements are so modest compared to other 334*10465441SEvalZero more modern approaches, that it's not worth the effort to implement. 335*10465441SEvalZero 336*10465441SEvalZero41. Can you please sign these lengthy legal documents and fax them back to us 337*10465441SEvalZero so that we can use your software in our product? 338*10465441SEvalZero 339*10465441SEvalZero No. Go away. Shoo. 340