xref: /aosp_15_r20/external/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll (revision 9880d6810fe72a1726cb53787c6711e909410d58)
1*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -iv-users | FileCheck %s
2*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
3*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; Provide legal integer types.
4*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workertarget datalayout = "n8:16:32:64"
5*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
6*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; The value of %r is dependent on a polynomial iteration expression.
7*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker;
8*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: IV Users for loop %foo.loop
9*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK: {1,+,3,+,2}<%foo.loop>
10*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine i64 @foo(i64 %n) {
11*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
12*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %foo.loop
13*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
14*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerfoo.loop:
15*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %indvar = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvar.next, %foo.loop ]
16*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %indvar.next = add i64 %indvar, 1
17*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %c = icmp eq i64 %indvar.next, %n
18*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %c, label %exit, label %foo.loop
19*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
20*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerexit:
21*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %r = mul i64 %indvar.next, %indvar.next
22*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret i64 %r
23*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
24*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
25*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; PR15470: LSR miscompile. The test2 function should return '1'.
26*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker;
27*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; SCEV does not know how to denormalize chained recurrences, so make
28*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; sure they aren't marked as post-inc users.
29*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker;
30*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: IV Users for loop %test2.loop
31*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK: %sext.us = {0,+,(16777216 + (-16777216 * %sub.us))<nuw><nsw>,+,33554432}<%test2.loop> in %f = ashr i32 %sext.us, 24
32*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine i32 @test2() {
33*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
34*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %test2.loop
35*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
36*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workertest2.loop:
37*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %inc1115.us = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc11.us, %test2.loop ]
38*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %inc11.us = add nsw i32 %inc1115.us, 1
39*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %cmp.us = icmp slt i32 %inc11.us, 2
40*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %cmp.us, label %test2.loop, label %for.end
41*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
42*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerfor.end:
43*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %tobool.us = icmp eq i32 %inc1115.us, 0
44*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %sub.us = select i1 %tobool.us, i32 0, i32 0
45*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %mul.us = shl i32 %inc1115.us, 24
46*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %sub.cond.us = sub nsw i32 %inc1115.us, %sub.us
47*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %sext.us = mul i32 %mul.us, %sub.cond.us
48*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %f = ashr i32 %sext.us, 24
49*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %exit
50*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
51*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerexit:
52*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret i32 %f
53*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
54