xref: /aosp_15_r20/external/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/increasing-or-decreasing-iv.ll (revision 9880d6810fe72a1726cb53787c6711e909410d58)
1*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; RUN: opt -analyze -scalar-evolution < %s | FileCheck %s
2*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
3*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @f0(i1 %c) {
4*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f0
5*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
6*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %start = select i1 %c, i32 127, i32 0
7*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step  = select i1 %c, i32 -1,  i32 1
8*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %loop
9*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
10*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerloop:
11*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %loop.iv.inc, %loop ]
12*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
13*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK: %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
14*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {%start,+,%step}<%loop> U: [0,128) S: [0,128)
15*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, %step
16*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv.inc = add i32 %loop.iv, 1
17*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %be.cond = icmp ne i32 %loop.iv.inc, 128
18*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %leave
19*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
20*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerleave:
21*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret void
22*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
23*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
24*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @f1(i1 %c) {
25*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f1
26*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
27*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %start = select i1 %c, i32 120, i32 0
28*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step  = select i1 %c, i32 -8,  i32 8
29*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %loop
30*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
31*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerloop:
32*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %loop.iv.inc, %loop ]
33*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
34*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
35*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.1 = add i32 %iv, 1
36*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(1 + %start)<nuw><nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [1,122) S: [1,122)
37*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.2 = add i32 %iv, 2
38*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(2 + %start)<nuw><nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [2,123) S: [2,123)
39*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.3 = add i32 %iv, 3
40*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(3 + %start)<nuw><nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [3,124) S: [3,124)
41*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.4 = add i32 %iv, 4
42*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(4 + %start)<nuw><nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [4,125) S: [4,125)
43*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.5 = add i32 %iv, 5
44*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(5 + %start)<nuw><nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [5,126) S: [5,126)
45*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.6 = add i32 %iv, 6
46*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(6 + %start)<nuw><nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [6,127) S: [6,127)
47*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.7 = add i32 %iv, 7
48*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(7 + %start)<nuw><nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [7,128) S: [7,128)
49*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
50*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.1 = add i32 %iv, 1
51*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.2 = add i32 %iv, 2
52*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.3 = add i32 %iv, 3
53*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.4 = add i32 %iv, 4
54*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.5 = add i32 %iv, 5
55*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.6 = add i32 %iv, 6
56*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.7 = add i32 %iv, 7
57*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
58*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.m1 = sub i32 %iv, 1
59*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(-1 + %start)<nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [-1,120) S: [-1,120)
60*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.m2 = sub i32 %iv, 2
61*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(-2 + %start)<nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [-2,119) S: [-2,119)
62*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.m3 = sub i32 %iv, 3
63*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(-3 + %start)<nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [-3,118) S: [-3,118)
64*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.m4 = sub i32 %iv, 4
65*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(-4 + %start)<nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [-4,117) S: [-4,117)
66*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.m5 = sub i32 %iv, 5
67*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(-5 + %start)<nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [-5,116) S: [-5,116)
68*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.m6 = sub i32 %iv, 6
69*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(-6 + %start)<nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [-6,115) S: [-6,115)
70*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.m7 = sub i32 %iv, 7
71*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(-7 + %start)<nsw>,+,%step}<%loop> U: [-7,114) S: [-7,114)
72*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
73*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.m1 = sub i32 %iv, 1
74*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.m2 = sub i32 %iv, 2
75*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.m3 = sub i32 %iv, 3
76*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.m4 = sub i32 %iv, 4
77*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.m5 = sub i32 %iv, 5
78*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.m6 = sub i32 %iv, 6
79*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.m7 = sub i32 %iv, 7
80*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
81*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, %step
82*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv.inc = add i32 %loop.iv, 1
83*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %be.cond = icmp sgt i32 %loop.iv, 14
84*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %be.cond, label %leave, label %loop
85*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
86*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerleave:
87*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret void
88*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
89*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
90*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @f2(i1 %c) {
91*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f2
92*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
93*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %start = select i1 %c, i32 127, i32 0
94*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step  = select i1 %c, i32 -1,  i32 1
95*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %loop
96*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
97*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerloop:
98*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %loop.iv.inc, %loop ]
99*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
100*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.sext = sext i32 %iv to i64
101*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, %step
102*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.sext = sext i32 %iv to i64
103*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:   -->  {(sext i32 %start to i64),+,(sext i32 %step to i64)}<nsw><%loop> U: [0,128) S: [0,128)
104*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv.inc = add i32 %loop.iv, 1
105*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %be.cond = icmp ne i32 %loop.iv.inc, 128
106*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %leave
107*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
108*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerleave:
109*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret void
110*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
111*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
112*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @f3(i1 %c) {
113*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f3
114*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
115*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
116*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; NB! the i16 type (as opposed to i32), the choice of the constant 509
117*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; and the trip count are all related and not arbitrary.  We want an
118*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; add recurrence that will look like it can unsign-overflow *unless*
119*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; SCEV is able to see the correlation between the two selects feeding
120*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; into the initial value and the step increment.
121*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
122*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %start = select i1 %c, i16 1000, i16 0
123*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step  = select i1 %c, i16 1,  i16 509
124*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %loop
125*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
126*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerloop:
127*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv = phi i16 [ 0, %entry ], [ %loop.iv.inc, %loop ]
128*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv = phi i16 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
129*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.zext = zext i16 %iv to i64
130*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.zext = zext i16 %iv to i64
131*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(zext i16 %start to i64),+,(zext i16 %step to i64)}<nuw><%loop> U: [0,64644) S: [0,64644)
132*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.next = add i16 %iv, %step
133*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv.inc = add i16 %loop.iv, 1
134*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %be.cond = icmp ne i16 %loop.iv.inc, 128
135*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %leave
136*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
137*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerleave:
138*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret void
139*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
140*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
141*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @f4(i1 %c) {
142*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f4
143*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
144*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; @f4() demonstrates a case where SCEV is not able to compute a
145*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; precise range for %iv.trunc, though it should be able to, in theory.
146*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; This is because SCEV looks into affine add recurrences only when the
147*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; backedge taken count of the loop has the same bitwidth as the
148*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; induction variable.
149*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
150*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %start = select i1 %c, i32 127, i32 0
151*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step  = select i1 %c, i32 -1,  i32 1
152*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %loop
153*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
154*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerloop:
155*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %loop.iv.inc, %loop ]
156*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
157*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.trunc = trunc i32 %iv to i16
158*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.trunc = trunc i32 %iv to i16
159*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:   -->  {(trunc i32 %start to i16),+,(trunc i32 %step to i16)}<%loop> U: full-set S: full-set
160*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, %step
161*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv.inc = add i32 %loop.iv, 1
162*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %be.cond = icmp ne i32 %loop.iv.inc, 128
163*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %leave
164*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
165*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerleave:
166*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret void
167*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
168*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
169*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @f5(i1 %c) {
170*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f5
171*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
172*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %start = select i1 %c, i32 127, i32 0
173*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step  = select i1 %c, i32 -1,  i32 1
174*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %loop
175*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
176*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerloop:
177*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv = phi i16 [ 0, %entry ], [ %loop.iv.inc, %loop ]
178*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
179*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.trunc = trunc i32 %iv to i16
180*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.trunc = trunc i32 %iv to i16
181*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(trunc i32 %start to i16),+,(trunc i32 %step to i16)}<%loop> U: [0,128) S: [0,128)
182*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, %step
183*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
184*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv.inc = add i16 %loop.iv, 1
185*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %be.cond = icmp ne i16 %loop.iv.inc, 128
186*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %leave
187*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
188*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerleave:
189*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret void
190*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
191*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
192*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @f6(i1 %c) {
193*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f6
194*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
195*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %start = select i1 %c, i32 127, i32 0
196*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step  = select i1 %c, i32 -2,  i32 0
197*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %loop
198*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
199*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerloop:
200*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv = phi i16 [ 0, %entry ], [ %loop.iv.inc, %loop ]
201*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
202*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:   %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
203*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {%start,+,(1 + %step)<nuw><nsw>}<%loop> U: [0,128) S: [0,128)
204*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
205*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step.plus.one = add i32 %step, 1
206*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, %step.plus.one
207*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.sext = sext i32 %iv to i64
208*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:   %iv.sext = sext i32 %iv to i64
209*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(sext i32 %start to i64),+,(1 + (sext i32 %step to i64))<nsw>}<nsw><%loop> U: [0,128) S: [0,128)
210*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv.inc = add i16 %loop.iv, 1
211*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %be.cond = icmp ne i16 %loop.iv.inc, 128
212*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %leave
213*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
214*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerleave:
215*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret void
216*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
217*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
218*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @f7(i1 %c) {
219*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @f7
220*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry:
221*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %start = select i1 %c, i32 127, i32 0
222*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %step  = select i1 %c, i32 -1,  i32 1
223*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br label %loop
224*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
225*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerloop:
226*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv = phi i16 [ 0, %entry ], [ %loop.iv.inc, %loop ]
227*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv = phi i32 [ %start, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
228*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.trunc = trunc i32 %iv to i16
229*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.trunc = trunc i32 %iv to i16
230*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(trunc i32 %start to i16),+,(trunc i32 %step to i16)}<%loop> U: [0,128) S: [0,128)
231*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.next = add i32 %iv, %step
232*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
233*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.trunc.plus.one = add i16 %iv.trunc, 1
234*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.trunc.plus.one = add i16 %iv.trunc, 1
235*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(1 + (trunc i32 %start to i16))<nuw><nsw>,+,(trunc i32 %step to i16)}<%loop> U: [1,129) S: [1,129)
236*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
237*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %iv.trunc.plus.two = add i16 %iv.trunc, 2
238*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK:  %iv.trunc.plus.two = add i16 %iv.trunc, 2
239*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; CHECK-NEXT:  -->  {(2 + (trunc i32 %start to i16))<nuw><nsw>,+,(trunc i32 %step to i16)}<%loop> U: [2,130) S: [2,130)
240*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
241*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %loop.iv.inc = add i16 %loop.iv, 1
242*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  %be.cond = icmp ne i16 %loop.iv.inc, 128
243*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  br i1 %be.cond, label %loop, label %leave
244*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
245*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerleave:
246*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker  ret void
247*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker}
248