162     uint32_t usecs;  in ble_ll_sched_conn_reschedule()  local
175         usecs = connsm->slave_cur_window_widening;  in ble_ll_sched_conn_reschedule()
176         sch->start_time -= (os_cputime_usecs_to_ticks(usecs) + 1);  in ble_ll_sched_conn_reschedule()
340      * request. At 1 Mbps, this is 1752 usecs, or 57.41 ticks. Using 57 ticks  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
341      * makes us off ~13 usecs. Since we dont want to actually calculate the  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
348      * 13 usecs before (this is important).  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
367      * we are transmitting 1253 usecs from the earliest start. This would cause  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
517          * to set the anchor point usecs; just transmit to the nearest tick.  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
570      * request. At 1 Mbps, this is 1752 usecs, or 57.41 ticks. Using 57 ticks  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
571      * makes us off ~13 usecs. Since we dont want to actually calculate the  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
578      * 13 usecs before (this is important).  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
597      * we are transmitting 1253 usecs from the earliest start. This would cause  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
703          * to set the anchor point usecs; just transmit to the nearest tick.  in ble_ll_sched_master_new()
750      * XXX: for now, we dont care about anchor point usecs for the slave. It  in ble_ll_sched_slave_new()
753      * usecs to ticks could be off by up to 1 tick.  in ble_ll_sched_slave_new()
1352          * given usecs.*/  in ble_ll_sched_scan_req_over_aux_ptr()